Perry's profilePerry Bradford-Wilson, S...PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Perry Wilson

Occupation
Location
Many of my short stories and novels can be found linked at my website, http://www.perrybw.com/
visit http://www.perrybw.com/

Perry Bradford-Wilson, Storyteller

Some interesting Lists, a little History, a few Stories, and a Subjective Stream Of Consciousness by Perry Bradford-Wilson
June 10

"Star Trek" was Great, But Flawed

Okay, upfront:  Star Trek was a really good film.  Especially the casting, which should have been the hardest part of a reboot like this.  Pine, Quinto, Urban, et al, were uniformly good as these iconic characters without ever becoming caricatures.  The action is stunning, the direction is solid, and it looks better visually than any Star Trek film ever made.  No doubt about it.  But there are several weaknesses that still leave "ST II: Wrath of Khan" as the best film in the series.  And, as might be expected considering that these writers are the same folks who gave us "Transformers," the weaknesses are all in the writing.  The moments that stand out like sore thumbs:

1) The amazing faux science which suggests that a single supernova could "threaten the galaxy."  Okay, maybe they skipped having a science consultant on this film, but even my daughter could figure this one out, and she's ten.  "Red Matter" I can go with (although "Protomatter" might have been better and a nice nod to ST III:TSFS.)  But supernovas are a real celestial phenomenon.  We know how they work.
2) Spock Prime standing in the snow on Delta Vega, looking up, and watching Vulcan - hanging in the sky about ten times the size of Earth's moon - implode. In this new universe does Vulcan have a moon? An incredibly close sister planet? If its so close to Vulcan and can support life, why no Vulcan colonies?
3) Spock The Younger shooting Kirk off in a life capsule to a planet with dangerous life forms which might eat him... instead of just locking him up in the brig.
4) The SUDDEN INEXPLICABLE PROMOTION of Kirk, with absolutely no field experience, from Cadet to First Officer/Captain.

I'd add more (there are many more), but I don't want to nitpick.  The sad thing is, every one of these weaknesses could have been cleared up easily with some better writing.  For instance:

1) It's Romulus's own star that is going supernova, threatening just Romulus.
2) Spock doesn't "see" Vulcan imploding but, rather, "feels" the death of billions of Vulcans (as he did when the Vulcan ship Intrepid was destroyed in the TOS episode "The Immunity Syndrome.")  Plus it would have been a great acting moment for Nimoy, as he sees in his mind the destruction of Vulcan and feels their bewilderment and pain.
3) Uhura picks up a distress call that indicates the same "future technology" Nero uses coming from Delta Vega (being broadcast by Spock Prime, natch) and, in order to get rid of him, Spock The Younger *assigns* Kirk to take a shuttle to investigate.  This also makes the extreme coincidence of Kirk running directly into Spock Prime's snow cave more palatable - he's looking for Spock Prime, following the distress signal.
4) A suggestion is made that the cadets have had some field experience while still enrolled at the Academy.  Maybe Kirk has done a tour as a cadet on the Farragut, as he did in TOS, and distinguished himself a bit ("Wow!  Good job on the Farragut! You made Second Officer as a cadet!"  "Well, that's what happens when half of your crew gets killed."  Short and sweet, suggests he has some real world experience, and is a nice nod to the TOS episode "Obsession.")  Also, it could be made clear Pike was already intending to make Kirk his First Officer on board the Enterprise when Kirk's Kobayashi Maru reprogramming caper nixed the deal.  Kirk had gotten wind of his probable assignment, which is why he is so surprised on the flight deck when he doesn't get assigned to a ship.  It makes Pike's decision to go ahead and make Kirk his First Officer once he's onboard (with McCoy's medical help) more a reinforcement of a decision Pike had already made rather than something rash.

These are all small fixes which don't fundamentally alter the dramatic flow or character arcs of the film, but fill in the massive plot holes.  All that said, I liked the film and will be there on day one for the sequel!  I just hope that they take more care during the screenwriting of the next film.
May 05

The Dog Days of Summer Approach (aka New Puppy Coming)

     Alexandria, will be 10 this summer.  Our only pets, currently, are a grown cat named Suki (after Sokka's girlfriend on "Avatar: The Last Airbender") and a few fish inhabiting our freshwater aquarium.  Until last Christmas we also had a wonderful Australian Shepherd-mix named Baby, who was a rescue dog.  Baby passed away in late December at what the veterinarian estimates was the age of about 16.  After we lost Baby we promised Alexandria a new puppy once school ended for the year, and she has spent - literally - hours each day studying and preparing for this new arrival.
     Alexandria wants to be a veterinarian when she grows up.  (She was crushed when "Dogs For Kids Magazine" ceased publication earlier this year, but was happy that her subscription would be filled out by issues of "Dog Fancy.")  She has numerous books on dogs, and now reads adult books on the subject.  In fact, she can look at pretty much any dog and tell you the breed, its temperament, and anything else you want to know about it.  Over the last few months she has poured over "The Original Dog Bible: The Definitive Source to All Things Dog" cover-to-cover, trying to decide what breed she wanted to get when it was time for the new puppy.  She moved on to "Puppy Training For Kids," and once she decided she wanted a Golden Retreiver she added "How To Train Your Golden Retriever."
     Alex has already chosen the dog house she wants (although this will be an inside dog as much as an outside dog) and even contacted a dog trainer that used to work part-time as a secretary at her school in order to prearrange lessons.  She is very serious about all of this!
     Mary and I tried to encourage Alex to get a rescue dog of any breed, but after her studies she became convinced that a Golden Retriever was the best dog for her and that she wanted to bond with it from puppyhood.  This is such an important & life-changing matter to her that we decided this was a choice she should be allowed to make.  She has a calendar in her room, counting down the days until "puppy day."  I just hope we can find an affordable golden retriever puppy, at the right age, on schedule!
November 02

Talking about Decision '08 Presidential Results

 

Quote

  
September 11

Energy policy is the key to everything

“...in my opinion, there never was a good War, or a bad Peace. What vast additions to the Conveniences and Comforts of Living might Mankind have acquired, if the Money spent in Wars had been employed in Works of public utility!”
— Benjamin Franklin, 1783

The monthly operating cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is about $16 billion.  Roughly every American household is spending $138 per month on the current operating costs of the wars.  The Bush administration budget request for 2008 was $196 billion for both wars, with $159 billion going to Iraq.  (See http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/apr/01/iraq-war-100-month/ )  If the United States were 100% energy-independent would we even be involved in these wars?  If we spent just one year's war expense on developing solar, wind, or other renewabe energy resources we might be free of foreign oil dependency right now.  Energy policy IS foreign policy, economic policy, environmental policy.  It is the key to everything.

A good comparison of the candidates' Energy policies is currently available at CNN.com (see link below.)  Senator Obama's plan is clearly the better plan, as Sentaor McCain's merely keeps the status quo.  The only place Obama's plan seems to underserve is in "Cars & driving", where he seems to support flex-fuel vehicles and renewable biofuels over electric vehicles.  Fuels are commodities, and as long as we continue to rely on them we will continue to pay large amounts for our energy.  Electricity can be generated a many different ways.  In the future residences may be outfitted with solar panels, windmills, and other electricity generating devices so that once the equipment is paid for our energy will be essentially free.  Imagine never having to pay a dime for fuel ever again.  We must concentrate on electricity and leave the big corporations who want to keep selling us high priced combustible fuels behind.

McCain's plan pretty much focuses on drilling and making more and more money for Exxon, Chevron and Shell. However there is one interesting item which has been well publicized.  He is proposing a $300 million award for "the development of a battery package that has the size, capacity, cost and power to leapfrog the commercially available plug-in hybrids or electric cars."  Granted, $300 million is probably a drop in the bucket when it comes to battery research and development, but so was the Ansari X Prize for the development of a private space craft, and yet it worked.  These sorts of "prizes" capture the public imagination.  Certainly Obama isn't going to jump on this bandwagon right now, as he would be accused on copying his opponent, but after inauguration it might be an interesting way to reach out to his defeated Republican opponent in a show of nonpartisan unity.  "Senator McCain, about that $300 million battery award you suggested..."

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.energy.html

More on Energy Independence

As a follow-up to my last post;  My family's goal is to achieve "off-the-grid" energy independence.  Between solar panels, windmill power generation, and a variety of surprisingly affordable ways to generate our own electricity at our home, we hope to be free of the power company grid in less than seven years.  We already use rechargeable batteries for our mobile devices.  If we are able to purchase an all-electric plug-in vehicle then we could become virtually energy independent, since even the power our car used would be self-generated.

Imagine if just 25% of Americans achieved this.  Not only might the reduced carbon output put a dent in global warming, but the political and economic impact on the United States would be enormous.

The current energy crisis has energized the populace and made this kind of transition politically possible.  Senator Obama, if you are listening, this is our opportunity.

Complete energy independence

One issue I would like to see Senator Obama address is the subject of electric vehicles.  Many in government seem to tout the idea of hydrogen fuel cells, which seems to me just another excuse to create a marketable commodity - hydrogen.  We have the technology *right now* to move beyond energy as a commodity and allow Americans to be completely free of outside energy domination.

Plug-In Electric vehicles would require no "fuel" whatsoever, only electrical charging.  And electricity can be generated in many many ways.  As techonology improves most Americans could install solar panels on their roofs and outbuildings, put high-productivity windmills in their backyards, and use other carbon-free methods to generate their OWN electricity for both their homes and their vehicles, paying NO ONE for the commodity.  Our economy would remain strong as the dollars spent would move to solar panel production, windmill production, etc.   The United States is uniquely poised to capture this industry and bring all of those energy dollars back home.

Only through our citizens' self-generation of electricity can America achieve true energy independence.  As long as energy is still a commodity that is bought and sold the people who control the commodity will have the rest of us under their control.

Facts for use when debating your misguided friends

For those of you new to the mybarackobama.com site and also the folks I have invited to read my ObamaBlog:  There are some good places on the web to get the straight facts to keep our candidate from being Swift Boated by the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy".  Try Obama's own  http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/ for rumor-correction.  Another good site is http://snopes.com/politics/obama/obama.asp .  Use these facts when debating your misguided friends.

Thanks!

H.R. 676 in 2009

Everyone running for public office has their own Universal Health Care plan.  Meanwhile the best solution to the American health care crisis is already sitting on desks throughout Washington, DC:  H.R. 676.  (See http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676.shtml ).  The easiest way to cut all of the excessive costs out of health care is to cut out the completely unnecessary middleman:  The Health Insurance Companies.  If all of the money Americans spent on health care was actually SPENT on health care instead of draining away to the back pockets of insurance companies there would be more than enough money to take care of everyone.  It's clear why no candidate will support H.R. 676 prior to the election, however... the money machine of the Health Insurance Industry would gear up and destroy any candidate who supported it.  Let us hope that, once in office as President, Senator Obama can resist the money and attacks by the greedy (and again, unnecessary) Insurance Industry and back H.R. 676.

The Right Side is The Left

Although I am not an especially religious person myself (I do have my own personal spiritual beliefs) I have always been at a loss to understand how The Right coopted Christianity, given how the teachings of Jesus and the platform of the Republican Party are completely at odds.  The following is for Christian or Evangelical voters who still don't know who they are going to vote for, and why they have to vote for Obama.

(Quotes from jesusisaliberal.org)

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional or established forms or ways.  Jesus was a pluralist Liberal who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox views of God, religion, and life.  He rejected greed, violence, the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without social balance, and the personal judging of others, their lifestyles and beliefs.

Over and over again, He taught us to believe in and live a spiritual and ethical life based in our essential, inherent goodness.  What Jesus promoted was succinct set of spiritual principals and a way of life based upon the of love, compassion, tolerance, and a strong belief in the importance in giving and of generosity to those in need.

Biblical Quotes Supporting the Belief that Jesus Is A Liberal

Peacemaking, not War Making: Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. [Matthew 5:9]  Resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. [Matthew 5:39]  I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despite-fully use you, and persecute you; [Matthew 5:44]

The Death Penalty: Thou shalt not kill [Matthew 5:21]

Crime and Punishment: If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to cast a stone at her. [John 8:7]  Do not judge, lest you too be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. [Matthew 7:1 & 2.]  

Justice: Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.  [Matthew 5:6] Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy [Matthew 5:7]  But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.  [Matthew 6:15]

Corporate Greed and the Religion of Wealth: In the temple courts [Jesus] found men selling cattle, sheep and doves and other sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. [John 2:14 & 15.] Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions. [Luke 12.15.]  Truly, I say unto you, it will be hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. [Matthew 19:23] You cannot serve both God and Money. [Matthew 6:24.]

Paying Taxes & Separation of Church & State: Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.  [Matthew 22:21] 

Community:  Love your neighbor as yourself. .[Matthew 22:39]  So in everything, do to others as you would have them do to you.[Matthew 7:12.]  If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. [Matthew 19:21] 

Equality & Social Programs: But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. You will be repaid at the resurrection of the just. [Luke 14:13 &14.] 

Public Prayer & Displays of Faith: And when thou pray, thou shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.  But thou, when thou pray, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret…
[Matthew 6:6 & 7]

Strict Enforcement of Religious Laws: If any of you has a son or a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out?  [Matthew 12:11] The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. [Mark 2:27.]

Individuality & Personal Spiritual Experience: Ye are the light of the world. [Matthew 5:14]

August 15

BAD MOVES

Try to figure out these crazy studios.
 
Paramount originally had "Star Trek" scheduled for a December 2008 release.  The film has experienced no delays and will be ready by that time.  Its only competition would have been Fox's "Day The Earth Stood Still," an iffy remake starring Keanu Reeves.  But, inexplicably, Paramount moved "Star Trek" to May 2009, where it will go head-to-head with Fox's "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," Columbia's "Da Vinci Code" sequel "Angels & Demons" starring Tom Hanks, Universal's new Sasha Baron Cohen comedy "Bruno,", the new Pixar animated film "Up" released by Disney and, most demographically damaging of all, Warner's "Terminator Salvation," the revival of the Terminator series starring the Dark Knight himself, Christian Bale.  How they expect "Star Trek" to make any money in this crowded marketplace is a mystery.
 
What's more, Paramount moved "Star Trek" into a summer where they already had big-budget blockbusters of their own, including Michael Bay's "Transformers 2" and Stephen Sommers' "GI Joe," already scheduled for release.  They didn't really need "Star Trek" to add to their product in that timeframe.  So why sacrifice it?  With "Star Trek" gone all Paramount has left for fourth quarter 2008 is the Dreamworks Animated film "Madagascar 2," for which they only receive a distribution fee, and "The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button," an artsy film that despite the presence of Brad Pitt may not translate to big box office.  Essentially, Paramount moved "Star Trek" from an open, low-competition frame where they had very little other product to a summer that was crowded with blockbusters, some of them Paramount's own.
 
Following this same poor logic, Warner Bros has now moved "Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince" from November 2008 to July 2009.  This leaves Warners with nothing for the fourth quarter of this year but "Four Christmases" - a holiday rom com with Vince Vaughn and Reese Witherspoon, and "Yes Man" - a Jim Carrey comedy.  Meanwhile the move pits "Harry Potter" in a summer battle against Warner's own "Terminator Salvation," Pixar's "Up," Fox's "The A-Team," Fox's "Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs," Roland Emmerich's mega-disaster flick "2012" from Sony, Universal's Will Ferrell vehicle "Land of The Lost," and Paramount's big-budget "GI Joe."
 
Nothing with any significant box office potential is left on the schedule for November 2008 but MGM's new James Bond film "Quantum of Solace" and Disney's CGI kiddie film "Bolt."  As it stands, James Bond might have his biggest grosses yet, mostly because "Quantum of Solace" will be the only game in town.
 
So, why are the studios abandoning a wide-open fourth quarter and moving their films into the crowded summer of 2009?  There are many theories - some blame the U.S. Presidential election, for example.  But the studios' attempt to blame these moves on the writers' strike is disingenuous.  This coming holiday season - the one they're moving all of their films away from - is the frame most affected by the strike.  By next summer, as the crowded release schedule shows, the production machine will be kicking out new films by the dozens.  Another lame excuse is that "a weekend opened up."  Well, there are lots of weekends in November and December, too.
 
Alan Horn at Warner Bros tried to explain that summer was better for Harry Potter movies, because "Harry Potter & The Order Of The Phoenix" - a summer release - made $292 million.  Of course, "Harry Potter & The Goblet of Fire" made almost the same amount ($290 million) in the holiday season, and "Harry Potter & The Sorcerer's Stone" opened in November and collected $317 million.
 
Whatever poor mathematics the studios are using, human nature isn't going to change.  This fall, when there are no huge performers the box office, the media will again predict the collapse of theatrical distribution and the studios will shrug and say "Who knew?"  Next summer there will be too many movies opening on too few screens and the audience will go see as many as they can afford to.  If "Star Trek" or "Terminator" or "Harry Potter" underperforms the studios will blame "franchise fatigue" instead of their own inept scheduling and marketing.
 
Photo 1 of 9